A speaker arguing for world peace is likely using which appeal?

A speaker arguing for world peace is likely employing an appeal to idealism. This approach emphasizes the belief in a better, more harmonious world and the values associated with peace, cooperation, and understanding among people and nations. Idealism as a rhetorical strategy inspires the audience by appealing to their aspirations and values, encouraging them to envision a peaceful future and consider the positive ramifications of such a goal.

By appealing to ideals, the speaker connects emotionally with the audience, fostering hope and motivation to take action towards achieving world peace. This form of appeal is potent in persuasive speaking because it resonates with individuals' desires for a just and peaceful society, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of the argument.

The other options, while also relevant in different contexts of argumentation, do not align as closely with the theme of advocating for world peace. False dilemma and slippery slope refer to specific logical fallacies rather than idealistic arguments. Determination, although a positive trait, does not specifically encapsulate the notion of promoting a vision of peace as a core value.