Supporting a claim by indicating similarities with another concept or subject is referred to as which of the following?

Supporting a claim by indicating similarities with another concept or subject is known as arguing from analogy. This technique involves drawing parallels between two different ideas or situations to help clarify or reinforce a point. By illustrating how one thing is similar to another, a speaker can effectively make an argument more relatable and easier to understand for the audience.

When a speaker uses an analogy, they are often able to highlight important characteristics that are shared between the two concepts, thus making the argument stronger and more persuasive. Analogies can also help to evoke emotions and create vivid imagery, making the information more engaging for the audience.

The other methods mentioned, while useful in their own rights, do not focus on similarities in the same way. Arguing from causation focuses on establishing a cause-and-effect relationship, arguing from example uses specific instances to illustrate a broader point, and arguing from sign relies on evidence that suggests a conclusion exists based on certain indicators. Each of these approaches serves a different purpose in constructing an argument.