The process of evaluating a speech based on its value, credibility, and thoroughness is referred to as which of the following?

The process of evaluating a speech based on its value, credibility, and thoroughness is known as critical analysis. This approach involves systematically assessing various components of the speech, such as the clarity of the argument, the support provided for claims, and the overall effectiveness in communicating the message to the audience. Critical analysis encourages the listener to think critically about the speech, considering not just what is said, but how it is presented and the effectiveness of its delivery.

By engaging in critical analysis, one can determine whether the speaker has successfully conveyed their ideas and whether those ideas are backed by credible evidence and logical reasoning. This evaluation is essential for both speakers seeking to improve their skills and for audiences trying to discern the strengths and weaknesses of the presentations they encounter.

In contrast, the other options do not encapsulate the comprehensive evaluation process that critical analysis entails. For instance, initial audience attitude pertains to how an audience feels about a topic before a speech, while expert opinion method focuses on the views of specialists rather than a holistic analysis of the speech itself. Criteria satisfaction involves the fulfillment of specific standards but lacks the depth of engaging with the speech's overall effectiveness and credibility.