Which language choice is suitable for a speaker needing to show impartiality on a controversial topic?

Using words with denotative meanings is particularly suitable for a speaker needing to show impartiality on a controversial topic because denotative language is precise, clear, and devoid of any emotional connotations. This type of language focuses on the explicit meaning of words, thereby minimizing the potential for bias or subjective interpretation.

When discussing a controversial issue, maintaining neutrality is essential to foster an environment conducive to open dialogue and understanding. By opting for denotative language, the speaker can present facts and information without swaying the audience's emotions, allowing listeners to form their own opinions based on the information provided rather than being influenced by charged language.

In contrast, slang and jargon may alienate some audience members or convey a lack of seriousness about the topic. Words with connotative meanings carry emotional implications and can inadvertently suggest bias, while clichés and imagery can evoke preconceived notions and strong feelings, which do not support impartiality. Thus, denotative language is the most effective choice for maintaining neutrality in potentially divisive discussions.