Which of the following is an example of a specific purpose statement for a speech about the U.S. Supreme Court?

A specific purpose statement for a speech clearly outlines what the speaker intends to accomplish with their presentation. In this case, the choice indicating the intention "to teach the audience about the Supreme Court" is correct because it establishes a clear educational objective. This clarity helps guide the content that will be covered in the speech, ensuring that the audience knows what they can expect to learn about the U.S. Supreme Court.

A specific purpose statement needs to not only convey the topic but also reflect the desired outcome of the speech. This option conveys that the speaker aims to impart knowledge and facilitate the audience’s understanding of the subject, aligning effectively with the responsibilities of a speaker to inform.

On the other hand, the other choices do not achieve the specificity required for a specific purpose statement. For instance, stating an idea or concept in general terms does not communicate a direct purpose or outcome for the speech regarding the Supreme Court. Similarly, the statement about the Chief Justice provides an interesting assertion but lacks the intent necessary to guide a speech. Finally, while discussing the importance of understanding the Supreme Court is valuable, it doesn’t specify the speaker's aim for the audience’s learning experience in a concrete way.