Which of the following patterns of organization would be appropriate for a persuasive speech?

A problem-solution pattern of organization is especially effective for persuasive speeches because it allows the speaker to clearly present an issue or challenge and then propose a specific solution to that problem. This approach not only highlights the significance of the problem to the audience, making it relatable and urgent, but also empowers the speaker to convincingly argue for their proposed solution as the best or most effective course of action.

In a persuasive context, engaging the audience by outlining a problem helps to create a sense of need, while presenting a solution offers hope and a pathway forward, encouraging the audience to adopt the proposed changes or actions. This structure is commonly used in persuasive contexts, such as advocating for policy changes, community initiatives, or social causes, and allows for strong emotional and logical appeals that can motivate the audience to act.

Other patterns of organization, such as structure-function or time-sequence, are less suited for persuasive speeches as they focus more on informational delivery rather than convincing the audience of a specific viewpoint or action. Multiple-definition may clarify terms but does not build a compelling case for action like the problem-solution approach does.